Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv11969
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv01666
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
McAulay v. Clare County et al
as 2:2026cv11465
Plaintiff:
Robert Anthony McAulay
Defendant:
Clare County, Canteen Services, Dunn and others
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv11188
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv10908
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Troyer #514105 v. Unknown Party #1 et al
as 1:2026cv00846
Plaintiff:
John Christopher Troyer #514105
Defendant:
Unknown Party #1, Michigan Department of Corrections Healthcare Services and Unknown Party #2
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv10794
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv10719
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Preston #235170 v. Wilkins et al
as 2:2026cv00038
Plaintiff:
Harvey Preston #235170
Defendant:
Terry Wilkins, Marsha Nurkala, Timothy Wilson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Preston v. Wilkins et al
as 2:2026cv10422
Plaintiff:
Harvey Lee Preston
Defendant:
Terry Wilkins, Timothy Wilson, Marsha Nurkala and others
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
