Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Derrick v. Securus Technologies, Inc. et al
as 2:2026cv12491
Plaintiff:
Cory Odell Derrick
Defendant:
Securus Technologies, Inc., Viapath Technologies, Inc., Keefe Commisary Network and others
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Robinson #602273 v. Maiga et al
as 1:2026cv02113
Plaintiff:
Albert Reginald Robinson #602273
Defendant:
Unknown Maiga, Unknown Garnsey, Unknown Edgar and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv11969
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Quinney #193495 v. Fegan et al
as 2:2026cv00128
Plaintiff:
James L. Quinney #193495
Defendant:
Chad Fegan and Health Services
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Nagorny et al
as 1:2026cv01611
Plaintiff:
Derrick Johnson
Defendant:
Luba Nagorny, Ashley Johnson, Amy Rood and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv11188
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv10908
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Troyer #514105 v. Unknown Party #1 et al
as 1:2026cv00846
Plaintiff:
John Christopher Troyer #514105
Defendant:
Unknown Party #1, Michigan Department of Corrections Healthcare Services and Unknown Party #2
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv10794
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv10719
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
