Cases 1 - 10 of 90
Baiza v. Management Training Corporation et al
as 5:2024cv00115
Plaintiff:
Timothy Baiza
Defendant:
Management Training Corporation, Tiffany Graves, Myra Nkule and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Shelton v. Inmate Trust Fund
as 6:2024cv00084
Plaintiff:
David L. Shelton
Defendant:
Inmate Trust Fund
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shelton v. Shelton et al
as 6:2023cv00360
Plaintiff:
Donnel J. Shelton
Defendant:
Chief Deputy Sheriff Craig Shelton, Officer Anthony Garza and Dist. Attorney Tonda Curry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shelton v. Boedeker et al
as 1:2023cv00117
Plaintiff:
Stephen D. Shelton and Stephen D Shelton
Defendant:
Susan Boedeker, Sandra A. Castillo, Olivia Herrera and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shelton v. Curry et al
as 4:2023cv01799
Plaintiff:
Stephen D. Shelton
Defendant:
Joseph M Curry, Amanda J. Gregory, Susan Boedeker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shelton v. Lumpkin
as 2:2023cv00051
Petitioner:
Gregory James Shelton
Respondent:
TDCJ Director Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Johnson v. Fuller et al
as 9:2023cv00003
Plaintiff:
DeShawn Shelton Johnson
Defendant:
Charles R Fuller and Howard C Leblanc
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Johnson v. Fuller et al
as 4:2022cv02910
Plaintiff:
DeShawn Shelton Johnson
Defendant:
Charles R. Fuller and Leblanc Howard C
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shelton v. USA
as 1:2022cv00299
Petitioner:
Michael Jason Shelton
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate/Correct Illegal Sentence
Johnson v. Fuller et al
as 9:2022cv00132
Plaintiff:
DeShawn Shelton Johnson
Respondent:
Charles R Fuller and Leblanc Howard C
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
