Cases 1 - 10 of 52
MOMODU v. RICHARDSON et al
as 4:2015cv00145
Plaintiff:
BELLO SHAKA MOMODU
Defendant:
SHELTON RICHARDSON, TODD BINNION, SAUNDRA ARRINGTON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Momodu v. Richardson
as 1:2015cv02669
Petitioner:
Bello Shaka Momodu
Respondent:
Shelton Richardson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Soboroff v. Richardson et al
as 5:2013cv03082
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Soboroff
Defendant:
Shelton Richardson, (fnu) Scrivner, K. Klem and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Soboroff v. Scrivner et al
as 5:2013cv03081
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Soboroff
Defendant:
(fnu) Scrivner, K. Klem, (fnu) Spears and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Camp v. Richardson, et al
as 13-3078
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOSEPH CAMP
Defendant - Appellee:
SHELTON RICHARDSON, Warden, CCA-Leavenworth, in his official and individual capacity, PHILLIP VALDEZ, Former Assistant Warden, CCA-Leavenworth, in his individual capacity, KENNETH DAUGHERTY, Chief of Unit Management, CCA-Leavenworth, in his official and individual capacity and others
Walton v. Richardson et al
as 5:2012cv03145
Petitioner:
Leadell Walton
Respondent:
Shelton Richardson and United States Parole Commission
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Theodore McDowell v. Shelton Richardson, et al
as 12-16161
Petitioner - Appellant:
THEODORE CUSH MCDOWELL
Respondent - Appellee:
SHELTON RICHARDSON and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF ARIZONA
Theodore McDowell v. Shelton Richardson, et al
as 12-16102
Petitioner - Appellant:
THEODORE CUSH MCDOWELL
Respondent - Appellee:
SHELTON RICHARDSON and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF ARIZONA
Dorsey v. Richardson
as 5:2012cv03113
Petitioner:
Lemandreal Dorsey
Respondent:
Shelton Richardson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Dorsey v. Richardson
as 5:2012cv03087
Petitioner:
Lemandreal Dorsey
Respondent:
Shelton Richardson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
