Cases 1 - 10 of 31
HAYS v. WITTMAN et al
as 3:2023cv00149
Plaintiff:
DE'RECO D. HAYS
Defendant:
WITTMAN, SIMPSON, BRANCHVILLE CORRECTIONAL FACILITY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HAYS v. WITTMAN et al
as 1:2023cv00493
Plaintiff:
DE'RECO D. HAYS
Defendant:
WITTMAN, SIMPSON, BRANCHVILLE CORRECTIONAL FACILITY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HAYS v. WITTMAN et al
as 1:2023cv00496
Plaintiff:
DE'RECO D. HAYS
Defendant:
WITTMAN, SIMPSON, I.D.O.C. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HAYES v. WITTMAN et al
as 1:2022cv01269
Plaintiff:
DE'RECO D. HAYES
Defendant:
WITTMAN, SIMPSON, I.D.O.C. BRANCHVILLE CORRECTIONAL FACILITY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WHEELER v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2022cv00086
Plaintiff:
TRACEY WHEELER
Defendant:
INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, RICHARD BROWN, LAGENAUER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ake v. Kieffer et al
as 3:2021cv00709
Defendant:
R Kieffer, R Keiffer, T Byers and others
Plaintiff:
Shane A Ake
Not Classified By Court:
WESTVILLE E-FILE(Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SIMPSON v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2021cv00154
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Petitioner:
DOMINQUE SIMPSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
MUSELH v. SIMPSON et al
as 1:2019cv03570
Defendant:
JEFF TINDALL, CHRIS SMITH, MIKE SIMPSON and others
Plaintiff:
AKRAM ISMAIL MUSELH and AKRAM ISMAIL MUSLEH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
COVINGTON v. STATE OF INDIANA et al
as 1:2019cv01017
Defendant:
BRIAN SIMPSON, STATE OF INDIANA, DIANNE (THELMA) SIMPSON and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL COVINGTON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DAVIS v. BROWN et al
as 1:2019cv00009
Defendant:
JODEANNA RANEY, ROBINSON, RICHARD YARBER and others
Plaintiff:
SAMUEL DAVIS, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
