Cases 1 - 10 of 66
Scanlon v. State of Vermont
as 2:2023cv00570
Petitioner:
Kip Scanlon
Respondent:
State of Vermont
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Abdul-Kareem v. Vermont
as 2:2023cv00328
Petitioner:
Misbah Abdul-Kareem
Respondent:
State of Vermont
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-1579
Petitioner / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv00141
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Burke v. Touchette
as 22-1028
Petitioner / Appellant:
James Thomas Burke
Respondent / Appellee:
Mike Touchette, Commish, VT DOC, State of Vermont and David E. Tartter, Esq., Assist. Attorney General
Burke v. Touchette
as 22-896
Petitioner / Appellant:
James Thomas Burke
Respondent / Appellee:
Mike Touchette, Commish, VT DOC, State of Vermont and David E. Tartter, Esq., Assist. Attorney General
Johnson v. State of Vermont, Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2022cv00029
Plaintiff:
Olynthea Johnson
Defendant:
State of Vermont, Department of Corrections, Robert Wright, Sirena Zahn and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Woods v. State of Vermont, Department of Health et al
as 2:2022cv00008
Plaintiff:
George E. Woods, Jr., Joseph J Truszkowski, Tyler J. Glodgett and others
Defendant:
State of Vermont, Department of Health, Mark Levine, James Baker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Burke v. Vermont et al
as 5:2021cv00265
Plaintiff:
James T. Burke
Defendant:
State of Vermont, James Baker and Ms. Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Coffey v. State of Vermont et al
as 2:2021cv00050
Respondent:
Logan Scelza, Town of Hartford Police Department, Emily Zakauskas and others
Petitioner:
Gregory Coffey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
