Cases 1 - 10 of 22
Cottman v. Rodriguez et al
as 2:2023cv03104
Plaintiff:
Howard Cottman
Defendant:
Derek Anthony Rodriguez, Christopher Allen Smith, McPherson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Harrison v. Housand et al
as 2:2022cv00575
Plaintiff:
Dea'Shawn Harrison
Defendant:
Judge Housand and Scarlett A. Wilson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
James v. Wright et al
as 2:2020cv04228
Defendant:
Scarlett A. Wilson, K. Jenkins, John Burnett and others
Plaintiff:
Anthony Glenn James
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Marshall v. Ninth Circuit Solicitor's Office et al
as 2:2020cv02993
Defendant:
Benjamin Chad Simpson, John Does 1 - 10, South Carolina Law Enforcement Division and others
Plaintiff:
Bradley R. Marshall
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Washington v. Cannon
as 2:2019cv01929
Respondent:
Scarlett A. Wilson and Al Cannon
Petitioner:
Maurice D. Washington
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Goodwin v. Beatty et al
as 8:2018cv02062
Petitioner:
Desmonta Antwin Maurice Goodwin
Respondent:
Scarlett A Wilson and Chief Beatty
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Keith Miller v. Sheriff Al Cannon
as 18-6125
Petitioner - Appellant:
KEITH MILLER
Respondent - Appellee:
SHERIFF AL CANNON
Respondent:
CHIEF BEATTY, SCARLETT A. WILSON, PRELIMINARY HEARING COURT TRANSCRIPT RECORDS and others
Thomas v. Charleston County et al
as 2:2017cv01958
Plaintiff:
Clark D Thomas and George K Nichols
Defendant:
Folly Beach, City of, Nathan S Williams, James W Smiley, IV and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Demetrius Smalls v. Alan Wilson
as 16-6683
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DEMETRIUS JAROD SMALLS
Defendant - Appellee:
ALAN WILSON, SCARLETT A. WILSON, TRIPP LAWTON and others
Glynndeavin von Fox v. South Carolina
as 16-1335
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GLYNNDEAVIN VON FOX
Defendant - Appellee:
SOUTH CAROLINA, The State of and SOLICITOR SCARLETT A. WILSON
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
