Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Shaw v. Ward et al
as 4:2022cv00254
Plaintiff:
Dexter Shaw
Defendant:
Timothy Ward, Robert Toole, Cedric Taylor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BARTLEY et al v. HATCHER et al
as 5:2022cv00126
Plaintiff:
WANDA BARTLEY and RICKY LANE SILVERS
Defendant:
LATRICE HATCHER, SHANTREL JACKSON, DANIELLE JACKSON and others
Not Classified By Court:
SOUTHWESTERN JUDICIAL CIRCUIT DISTRICT ATTORNEY OFFICE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shaw v. Ward et al
as 4:2021cv00243
Plaintiff:
Dexter Shaw
Defendant:
Timothy Ward, Robert Toole, Johnny Sikes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Silvers v. Health Department
as 2:2021cv00248
Plaintiff:
Shanequa La'Chez Silvers
Defendant:
Health Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Daker v. Head et al
as 1:2020cv03690
Defendant:
Lisa Fountain, Freddie Davis, James Demetrius Smith and others
Plaintiff:
Waseem Daker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WEST v. PICKENS COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT et al
as 2:2018cv00230
Defendant:
PICKENS COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE, CHANTEL MCOY, GARY SILVERS and others
Plaintiff:
JAMIE LIGHTNER WEST
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WEST v. PICKENS COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT et al
as 4:2018cv00234
Defendant:
PICKENS COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE, CHANTEL MCOY, GARY SILVERS and others
Plaintiff:
JAMIE LIGHTNER WEST
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DIPIETRO v. BARRON et al
as 4:2018cv00179
Defendant:
DR SILVER, DR THOMPSON and JAMES F BARRON
Plaintiff:
ROBERT RALPH DIPIETRO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hensley v. Langford et al
as 4:2018cv00062
Plaintiff:
Willard Todd Hensley
Defendant:
Gary Langford, John Cherry, Brandon Amos and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McGill v. Langford et al
as 4:2016cv00258
Plaintiff:
Franklin Jay McGill
Defendant:
Gary Langford, Blake Ballew, Grace Holder and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
