Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Reed v. Garcia et al
as 1:2022cv01832
Plaintiff:
Jalil S. Reed
Defendant:
Lt. Garcia, Lt. M. Conrad, C.O. Harrison and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MCDANIELS v. STARKS et al
as 1:2022cv01816
Plaintiff:
Brandon Mcdaniels
Defendant:
c/o Starks, c/o Rasheed, SCI-Dallas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MCDANIELS v. STARKS et al
as 2:2022cv04396
Plaintiff:
BRANDON MCDANIELS
Defendant:
C/O STARKS, C/O RASHEED and SCI-DALLAS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TISDALE v. GAMBILL et al
as 3:2021cv00747
Defendant:
Kevin J. Ransom, G. Dominic Wellpath, Zachary Moslak and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher Tisdale
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Maye v. Pennsylvania Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2021cv00530
Defendant:
John Doe Defendants in Security at SCI Dallas, Captain Myer, Lieutenant Stark and others
Plaintiff:
Edward Anthony Maye
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TISDALE v. GAMBILL et al
as 2:2021cv00745
Defendant:
KEVIN J. RANSOM, G. DOMINIC WELLPATH, ZACHARY MOSLAK and others
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER TISDALE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
KIN v. SCI FAYETTE et al
as 2:2021cv00074
Defendant:
RUDOLPHE STARK and SCI FAYETTE
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL PAUL KIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Williams v. Smith et al
as 1:2017cv02323
Plaintiff:
Synquila Williams
Defendant:
Robert Smith , Correct Care Solutions , Donnaromma and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
KING v. AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS et al
as 2:2013cv04849
Plaintiff:
SELWYN KING
Defendant:
AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS, CINDY STARKE, ANITA RANIERI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stark v. Strada
as 1:2011cv01852
Petitioner:
James Stark
Respondent:
Frank Strada
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
