Cases 1 - 10 of 713
Perez-Perez v. Garland et al
as 3:2024cv00839
Petitioner:
Carlos Alberto Perez-Perez
Respondent:
Merrick Garland, Ronald L. Davis, Steven C. Stafford and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Crabb v. Lin
as 4:2024cv04088
Plaintiff:
Steven C Crabb
Defendant:
Michael Lin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Crabb v. Kulhan et al
as 4:2024cv04081
Plaintiff:
Steven C Crabb
Defendant:
Gary Kulhan, Carly Rhoades and Daniel Teel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Crabb v. Bozdech
as 4:2024cv04072
Plaintiff:
Steven C Crabb
Defendant:
John Bozdech
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Steven Crabb v. Wexford Healthcare Services, et al
as 24-1624
Plaintiff:
STEVEN C. CRABB
Defendant:
WEXFORD HEALTH SOURCES, INC. and GREG DONATHAN
Crabb v. Hogan
as 4:2024cv04071
Plaintiff:
Steven C Crabb
Defendant:
Heather Hogan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Frederick Stampone v. Michigan Supreme Court, et al
as 24-1252
Plaintiff:
FREDERICK STAMPONE
Defendant:
MICHIGAN SUPREME COURT, Official and or personal capacity, JULIE CLEMENT, Clerk, official and or personal capacity, MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS, Official and personal capacity and others
Crabb v. Jumper
as 4:2024cv04051
Plaintiff:
Steven C Crabb
Defendant:
Greg Donathan, John Doe, David Suire and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00375
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Moran-Munoz v. Garland et al
as 3:2024cv00373
Petitioner:
Javier Moran-Munoz
Respondent:
Merrick Garland, Ronald L. Davis, Alejandro Mayorkas and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
