Cases 1 - 10 of 265
Kelley v. USA
as 3:2024cv00707
Petitioner:
Steven Marcus Kelley
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Sencial v. Coll et al
as 2:2024cv00874
Plaintiff:
Steven Sencial
Defendant:
Arthur Coll, A Galvez, S Reina and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sepulvado v. Thomas et al
as 5:2024cv00159
Plaintiff:
Steven Dean Sepulvado, Jr
Defendant:
Daniel Thomas, Berlin Sweet, Jesse W Branam and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Vallejo v. Prator et al
as 5:2023cv01580
Plaintiff:
Joe Thomas Vallejo
Defendant:
Steven Prator, Rick Farris, Ms Fredieu and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bell v. Louisiana
as 6:2023cv01502
Plaintiff:
Steven Bell
Defendant:
Warden Louisiana State Penitentiary
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Robinson v. Rabb et al
as 2:2023cv05865
Plaintiff:
Darryl Flanders Robinson
Defendant:
Steven Rabb, Ched Sanchez, Terrence Holmes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. Zordan et al
as 3:2023cv01368
Plaintiff:
Eddie Brown, III
Defendant:
Victor Zordan, Joshua Lee, Steven Tew and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sencial v. Lopinto et al
as 2:2023cv03351
Plaintiff:
Steven Jay Sencial
Defendant:
Joseph Lopinto, III, Correct Health Jefferson LLC, Jody Lee Banks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sencial v. Lopinto et al
as 2:2023cv03054
Plaintiff:
Steven Jay Sencial
Defendant:
Joseph Lopinto, III and Steven Rabb
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Verdin v. Soignet et al
as 2:2023cv02735
Plaintiff:
Solomon J. Verdin, Jr.
Defendant:
Timothy Soignet, Rhonda Ledet, April Tomlin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
