Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Harris v. Wellpath Corporation, LLC et al
as 0:2024cv00022
Plaintiff:
Carlos Harris
Defendant:
Wellpath Corporation, LLC, Dr. Kevin Smith, Summer James and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Harris v. Wellpath, LLC et al
as 0:2024cv00012
Plaintiff:
Carlos Harris
Defendant:
Wellpath, LLC, Betty Noble, Lacy Russell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Williams v. Ramey et al
as 0:2023cv00104
Plaintiff:
Rodger E. Williams and Willow Williams
Defendant:
Betsy Ramey, Ferguson, President of WellPath and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Summers v. Louisville Metro Government et al
as 3:2023cv00189
Plaintiff:
Dell F. Summers
Defendant:
Louisville Metro Government, Louisville Metro Dept. of Corrections and Well Path
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Duncan v. West et al
as 6:2020cv00089
Plaintiff:
Demetrius Duncan
Defendant:
Jennifer West and Stephanie Summer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Duncan v. Marrero et al
as 6:2019cv00267
Respondent:
Crystal Mckiddy, Maria F. Marrero, J. Woods and others
Petitioner:
Demetrius Duncan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Ford v. Summers et al
as 6:2017cv00224
Plaintiff:
Edward E. Ford
Defendant:
S. Summers, J. Free, Crimarossa and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Summers v. Teasley et al
as 4:2016cv00141
Plaintiff:
Maurice Summers
Defendant:
Marty Teasley, James Hicks and Renfrow
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sharber v. Bolton et al
as 3:2016cv00526
Plaintiff:
Darryn Brett Sharber
Defendant:
Mark Bolton, City of Louisville, Louisville Metro Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Watkins v. USP McCreary et al
as 6:2016cv00137
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Watkins
Defendant:
USP McCreary, Pine Knots Kentucky, City of, Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
