Cases 1 - 10 of 22
Medina v. SunTrust Bank et al
as 3:2023cv01382
Plaintiff:
Derek Vernon Medina
Defendant:
SunTrust Bank and SunTrust Bank Owner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-12079
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Beaubrun v. Suntrust Bank Inc
as 1:2023cv00231
Plaintiff:
Thony Beaubrun
Defendant:
Suntrust Bank Inc
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pease v. SunTrust Bank et al
as 8:2021cv02949
Plaintiff:
Darien Jerode Pease, Sr.
Defendant:
SunTrust Bank, Johnnie L. Smart and Jen Marie Dejesus
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2021cv02687
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nivens v. First Financial Federal Credit Union et al
as 1:2020cv02959
Plaintiff:
Stephen Nivens
Defendant:
SunTrust Bank and First Financial Federal Credit Union
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
HUNTER MATHIS v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE et al
as 1:2018cv02702
Defendant:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE, U.S. SECURITY AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION and others
Plaintiff:
ERIC JEROME HUNTER MATHIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HUNTER v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE et al
as 7:2018cv00026
Plaintiff:
ERIC JEROME HUNTER
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY, UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nunn v. Suntrust Bank, L.L.C.
as 3:2014cv00072
Plaintiff:
Tyron Nunn, Sr.
Defendant:
Suntrust Bank, L.L.C.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jesus Lopez v. Barbara Strong, et al
as 13-5373
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JESUS M. LOPEZ
Defendant - Appellee:
BARBARA MARTIN STRONG, aka Barbara Lopez, JANET SHEHATA, FIRST CALL INCORPORATED and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
