Cases 1 - 10 of 27
Jung-Peters v. Bagley et al
as 7:2023cv00006
Plaintiff:
Marc Arron Jung-Peters
Defendant:
Ben Bagley, Akacia Teague, Vera Rogers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2020cv00535
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Wright v. Warden of the Suzanne Lee Kays Detention Facility
as 3:2019cv02445
Petitioner:
Brandon Keith Wright
Respondent:
Dallas County Sheriff's Office (Jail System) and Warden of the Suzanne Lee Kays Detention Facility
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Cook v. Davis et al
as 4:2019cv03839
Defendant:
Sandoval, Ardella Fisher, Suzanne Tenorio and others
Plaintiff:
Reyce Cook
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lyons v. Davis
as 1:2017cv00595
Respondent:
Lorie Davis
Notice Only Party:
Laura Haney
Petitioner:
Christine Suzanne Lyons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wilson v. TDCJ Personnel et al
as 9:2017cv00028
Plaintiff:
Sonny Wilson
Defendant:
TDCJ Personnel, Robert Eason, Hai Nguyen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Little et al v. United States of America et al
as 7:2017cv00009
Plaintiff:
Rhonda Fleming, Charlsa Suzanne Little and Jeanette Driever
Defendant:
Barack Hussein Obama, Democratic National Committee, Debbie Wasserman-Schultz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Little v. Upton et al
as 4:2016cv01079
Petitioner:
Charlsa Suzanne Little
Respondent:
Jody Upton, Department of Justice and Barack Obama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Little v. Upton, et al
as 4:2016cv01078
Petitioner:
Charlsa Suzanne Little
Respondent:
Jody Upton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Tolbert v. United States of America
as 7:2016cv00230
Plaintiff:
Cheryl Suzanne Tolbert
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
