Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Swift v. Warden of the Douglas County Correction Center
as 8:2020cv00354
Respondent:
Warden of the Douglas County Correction Center
Petitioner:
Ingerat Swift
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Swift v. Lux et al
as 4:2016cv03081
Defendant:
Judge Coffy, Jon Doe, Foxoll and others
Plaintiff:
Arnetta Swift
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Swift v. Sheriff of Douglas County Correctional Center
as 8:2016cv00152
Defendant:
Sheriff of Douglas County Correctional Center
Plaintiff:
Arnetta Swift
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Swift v. Foxhall et al
as 8:2016cv00151
Defendant:
Foxhall and Unknown John Doe
Plaintiff:
Arnetta Swift
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Swift Neehill v. Lux et al
as 8:2016cv00149
Defendant:
Correctional Officers, Heather, Mizki Jarebeck and others
Plaintiff:
Arnetta Swift Neehill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Swift Neehill v. Coffey et al
as 8:2016cv00106
Respondent:
Coffey and Sheriff of Douglas County
Interested Party:
Nebraska Attorney General
Petitioner:
Arnetta Swift Neehill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Swift v. Jerabek et al
as 8:2016cv00067
Defendant:
Judge Bazis, Foxall, Judge Huber and others
Plaintiff:
Arnetta Swift
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Swift et al v. Huber Judge et al
as 8:2016cv00053
Defendant:
Tim Dunning, Foxall, Huber Judge and others
Plaintiff:
Arnetta Swift and Charles Swift
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Swift v. Huber et al
as 8:2016cv00050
Respondent:
Tim Dunning, Foxall and Huber
Petitioner:
Charles Swift
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Swift v. West et al
as 8:2015cv00337
Defendant:
Nebraska Dept of Corrections, Omaha Correctional Center and Charlie West
Plaintiff:
Antonio Swift
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
