Cases 1 - 10 of 212
Beiza-Denova v. Hollenhorst
as 0:2024cv01718
Plaintiff:
Enahi Beiza-Denova
Defendant:
Thomas Hollenhorst
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wirth et al v. Burton et al
as 0:2024cv01595
Plaintiff:
Donald Joseph Wirth, Jr and Nicholas Thomas Stroeder
Defendant:
James Julis Burton, Jane Doe Number 1, Jane Doe Number 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Daywitt et al v. Harpstead et al
as 0:2023cv02110
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Steven Daywitt, Joseph Franciosa Thomas, Kenneth Gernard Parks and others
Defendant:
Jodi Harpstead, Nancy Johnston, Jannine Hebert and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Talbert v. Thomas
as 0:2023cv01284
Petitioner:
Jesse L. Talbert
Respondent:
Acting Warden Thomas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Hanes v. Sherburne County Jail et al
as 0:2023cv01191
Plaintiff:
Joshua Cameron Hanes
Defendant:
Sherburne County Jail, MenD Inc., Joel Brott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mehaffy v. Thomas
as 0:2023cv01182
Petitioner:
Ryan Daniel Mehaffy
Respondent:
Warden T. Thomas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
McAdory v. Thomas
as 0:2023cv01166
Petitioner:
Carlos Lattrell McAdory
Respondent:
Warden Thomas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Anderson v. Thomas
as 0:2023cv01137
Petitioner:
Jason Anderson
Respondent:
Warden Thomas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Vang v. Thomas
as 0:2023cv00858
Petitioner:
Phong Vang
Respondent:
Warden Thomas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Volpe v. Thomas
as 0:2023cv00761
Petitioner:
Justin A. Volpe
Respondent:
Warden Thomas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
