Cases 1 - 10 of 13
WILLIAMS v. PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 3:2024cv00095
Plaintiff:
NORMAN WILLIAMS, JR.
Defendant:
PA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, JAMES BARNACLE, MICHAEL TORRES and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 cr Notice of Removal - Civil Rights
Ortiz v. Zborovancik et al
as 3:2023cv00248
Petitioner:
Andy Ortiz
Respondent:
BM. Zborovancik, LIEUTENANT JOHN DOE, DAN CARO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
PARKER v. TICE, et al
as 2:2023cv01654
Plaintiff:
STEPHEN PARKER
Defendant:
E. TICE, M. HOUSER, M. PYLE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Ortiz v. Zborovancik et al
as 3:2023cv01345
Plaintiff:
Andy Ortiz
Defendant:
BM. Zborovancik, John Doe, Dan Caro and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CLARK v. ZBOROVANCIK
as 3:2023cv00041
Plaintiff:
MARK CLARK
Defendant:
BRIAN ZBOROUANCIK, BRIAN ZBOROVANCIK, ADAM CLARK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Cribbs v. Pennsylvania Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2022cv01950
Plaintiff:
Charlotte Elizabeth Cribbs
Defendant:
Pennsylvania Department of Corrections, John E. Wetzel, George Little and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BALL v. TILLER et al
as 2:2022cv01647
Plaintiff:
KYION BALL
Defendant:
L.P.N. MICHELLE TILLER, PSHYCHIATRIST, ANY AND ALL JOHN/JANE DOE(S) and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
NEWMAN v TICE et al
as 3:2021cv00105
Defendant:
RHU JOHN DOE, LT PRITZ, CAPT BOYCE and others
Plaintiff:
DARRYL B. NEWMAN, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
SCOTT v. WETZEL et al
as 3:2020cv00173
Plaintiff:
HARVEY SCOTT SCOTT and HARVEY SCOTT, JR.
Defendant:
SHAEFER, HAY, GERBER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
HOBSON v. TILLER et al
as 1:2018cv00233
Plaintiff:
ALBERT HOBSON
Defendant:
MR. JOHN TILLER and MRS. STEVENS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
