Cases 1 - 10 of 52
MEEKER et al v. BUSKIRK et al
as 5:2018cv01371
Plaintiff:
SAMUEL S. MEEKER and DYLAN V. EVERETT
Defendant:
TODD BUSKIRK, NORTHAMPTON COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MEEKER v. BUSKIRK et al
as 5:2018cv00824
Plaintiff:
SAMUEL J. MEEKER
Defendant:
TODD BUSKIRK, SANTOS, COUNTY OF NORTHAMPTON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MEEKER et al v. BUSKIRK et al
as 5:2018cv00757
Plaintiff:
SAMUEL S. MEEKER, KEYVON HINSON, TASHAWN HUNTER and others
Defendant:
TODD BUSKIRK, NORTHAMPTON COUNTY, STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MEEKER v. BUSKIRK et al
as 5:2018cv00458
Plaintiff:
SAMUEL SOUTHMAYD MEEKER
Defendant:
TODD BUSKIRK, THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA, THE COUNTY OF NORTHAMPTON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
REISINGER v. BUSKIRK et al
as 5:2018cv00460
Plaintiff:
RICHARD E. REISINGER
Defendant:
TODD BUSKIRK, COUNTY OF NORTHAMPTON, STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Curtis Phillips, Jr. v. Northampton CO., P.A., et al
as 16-3878
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CURTIS CLAY PHILLIPS, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
COUNTY OF NORTHAMPTON, ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA and TODD BUSKIRK
WARREN et al v. NORTHAMPTON COUNTY et al
as 5:2016cv01089
Plaintiff:
DANIEL WARREN and JASON SWIDERSKI
Defendant:
NORTHAMPTON COUNTY, JOHN A. BROWN, MARGARET FERRARO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LYTLE v. BUSKIRK et al
as 5:2016cv00186
Plaintiff:
DALTON J. LYTLE
Defendant:
TODD BUSKIRK, JOE KOSPIAH, NICOLE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SMITH v. BRANDON et al
as 5:2015cv03646
Plaintiff:
CARNELL L. SMITH
Defendant:
BLANE BRANDON, TODD BUSKIRK and JOHN HARMEN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GAYLE v. HARMAN et al
as 5:2015cv01827
Plaintiff:
WAYNE S. GAYLE
Defendant:
JOHN HARMAN, WORLY, JOSEPH KOSPIAH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
