Cases 1 - 10 of 85
Torres v. Doe et al
as 3:2024cv00650
Plaintiff:
Pedro Torres
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Torres v. Department of Correction et al
as 3:2024cv00615
Plaintiff:
Robert Torres
Defendant:
Department of Correction, Scott Semple and Osborn Corrections Insitute
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Torres et al v. Sample et al
as 3:2024cv00638
Plaintiff:
Hector M. Torres and Toliver
Defendant:
Sample and Osborn Correctional
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Torres et al v. Semple
as 3:2024cv00530
Plaintiff:
Ediburgo Torres and T Oliver
Defendant:
Semple
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jordan v. D.O.C. et al
as 3:2024cv00236
Plaintiff:
Victor L. Jordan, Sr.
Defendant:
D.O.C., Jennifer Reis, Pierce and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rogers v. Fontaine et al
as 3:2023cv01350
Plaintiff:
Wayne Rogers
Defendant:
Rachel Fontaine, Santiago, USman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ocasio v. Torres
as 3:2023cv01277
Plaintiff:
Brayan Ocasio
Defendant:
Torres
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Petteway et al v. Connecticut Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2023cv01101
Plaintiff:
Taveras, Christopher Q. Petteway, Christopher Deveau and others
Defendant:
Connecticut Department of Corrections, Craig Washington, Angel Quiros and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Grinvalsky v. Cartwright et al
as 3:2023cv00797
Plaintiff:
Stephen Grinvalsky
Defendant:
Maxlene Cartwright, Sara Torre, Karen Brody and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Perez v. Brunelle et al
as 3:2023cv00537
Plaintiff:
William Perez
Defendant:
Christopher Brunelle, Angel Quiros, Blackman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
