Cases 1 - 10 of 21
Trent v. Wisehart et al
as 3:2021cv08220
Plaintiff:
Max Randall Trent
Defendant:
Michael Wisehart, Heather D Noble and Scott M Lekan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bouhdida v. Ryan et al
as 2:2019cv04792
Defendant:
Attorney General of the State of Arizona and Charles L Ryan
Petitioner:
Trent Xavier Bouhdida, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Bouhdida v. Ryan
as 2:2018cv02354
Plaintiff:
Trent Xavier Bouhdida, Sr.
Defendant:
Charles L Ryan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bouhdida v. Arizona, State of et al
as 2:2017cv04692
Petitioner:
Trent Xavier Bouhdida, Sr.
Respondent:
Arizona, State of and Paul Penzone
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Dansby v. Maricopa County Sheriff's Office et al
as 2:2017cv04648
Plaintiff:
Trent Derrell Dansby
Defendant:
Maricopa County Sheriff's Office, Maricopa County Attorney's Office, Tempe Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dansby v. Maricopa County Sheriff's Office et al
as 2:2017cv04232
Plaintiff:
Trent Derrell Dansby
Defendant:
Paul Penzone, William G Montgomery and Tempe, City of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dansby v. Maricopa County Sheriff's Office et al
as 2:2017cv04231
Plaintiff:
Trent Derrell Dansby
Defendant:
Maricopa County Sheriff's Office, United States Marshals Service, Department of Homeland Security and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Bouhdida v. Maricopa County Sheriff's Office et al
as 2:2017cv02635
Plaintiff:
Trent Xavier Bouhdida, Sr.
Defendant:
Maricopa County Sheriff's Office, Superior Court, Paul Penzone and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bouhdida v. Maricopa County Superior Court
as 2:2017cv02287
Petitioner:
Trent Xavier Bouhdida, Sr.
Respondent:
Maricopa County Superior Court
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Dansby v. Tempe Police Department et al
as 2:2014cv01817
Plaintiff:
Trent Dansby
Defendant:
Tempe Police Department, Phoenix Police Department, Tempe Municipal Court and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
