Cases 1 - 10 of 46
West v. Gibson
as 1:2023cv11321
Plaintiff:
Bryan Marshall West
Defendant:
Tammie Gibson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
West #813767 v. Michigan Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2023cv00436
Plaintiff:
Bryan Marshall West #816767 and Bryan Marshall West #813767
Defendant:
Michigan Department of Corrections, Corizon Health, Tammie Gibson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pollard v. USA
as 2:2019cv12316
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Tammy Denice Pollard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Gentry v. Corizon Health Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv00258
Defendant:
Tammy J. Kelley, Michigan, State of, Corizon Health, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Richard Charles Gentry #132047
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gentry v. Corizon Health Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv10959
Defendant:
Tammy J. Kelley, State of Michigan, Corizon Health Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Richard Charles Gentry
Sedore #210661 v. Nagy et al
as 1:2019cv00061
Defendant:
Oliver Johnston, Michigan Department of Corrections, Noah Nagy and others
Plaintiff:
Scott Sedore #210661
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rose v. Wayne County et al
as 2:2018cv13786
Defendant:
Jennifer Phillips, Cathy Garrett, Robert Ficano and others
Plaintiff:
Willie Rose
Johnson v. One Village Entertainment et al
as 1:2018cv11568
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Anthony Johnson
Defendant:
One Village Entertainment, Image Entertainment, Inc., RLJ Entertainment, Inc. and others
White #285964 v. Michigan, State of et al
as 1:2018cv00224
Plaintiff:
Kala White #285964
Defendant:
Michigan, State of, Michigan Department of State Police, Michigan Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cannon v. Michigan Parole Board et al
as 2:2017cv14173
Plaintiff:
Ronald Cannon
Defendant:
Michigan Parole Board, HEIDI E. WASHINGTON, Melinda Braman and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
