Cases 1 - 10 of 52
Mullinax et al v. Griffin et al
as 0:2024cv02829
Plaintiff:
Trevor Mullinax and Tammy Beason
Defendant:
Michael Griffin, Daniel Taggart, Gary Pence and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
Barnette v. Polk et al
as 0:2023cv04240
Plaintiff:
Samuel Lamont Barnette, Mont Barnette and Lamont Barnette
Defendant:
Neddie L. Polk and Tammy Snipes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
Gilbert v. Hood et al
as 9:2022cv04470
Plaintiff:
Stephon Gilbert
Defendant:
Robert E. Hood, Tammie M. Pope and SCDC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Golson v. Ganes et al
as 1:2022cv00806
Plaintiff:
Eddie Clay Golson
Defendant:
Elloree A. Ganes, Tammy Way, Joy Campbell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Harrington v. Ray et al
as 4:2020cv01198
Defendant:
Director Ray, Officer Blanche Quick, Officer Michia Johnson and others
Plaintiff:
Jejauncey Fernando Harrington
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Yoho v. USA
as 3:2019cv02867
Petitioner:
Tammy L. Yoho
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Golson v. Campbell et al
as 1:2019cv02477
Defendant:
Brian P. Sterling, Joy Campbell and Tammy Way
Plaintiff:
Eddie Clay Golson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Adams v. Way et al
as 1:2019cv01446
Defendant:
Deresh T. Perez, Tammy L. Barbour, Duane Birchmore and others
Plaintiff:
Patrick Adams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Al-Haqq v. Johnson et al
as 2:2019cv00158
Plaintiff:
Bilal A Al-Haqq, Bilal Abdullah Al-Haqq and Michael Dion McFadden
Defendant:
Ms Tammy Way, Sgt. Foglebach, Ms Francine Baughman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Estate of John David Dellinger v. Bryant et al
as 1:2019cv00044
Defendant:
Sergeant Timothy Combs, Corporal Whitaker, Officer Gordon and others
Plaintiff:
John David Dellinger
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
