Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Tariq Belt v. DOJ, et al
as 12-5337
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Tariq L. Belt
Defendant - Appellee:
United States Department of Justice, United States Marshals Service, Executive Office for United States Attorneys and others
BELT v. US DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE et al
as 1:2012cv01202
Plaintiff:
TARIQ L. BELT
Defendant:
US DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, UNITED STATES MARSHALS SERVICE, EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF US ATTORNEYS and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
BELT v. OFFICE OF ATTORNEY GENERAL et al
as 4:2010cv02333
Petitioner:
Tariq L. Belt
Respondent:
Office of Attorney General, Eric Holder, U.s. district court district of maryland branch and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
BELT v. OFFICE OF ATTORNEY GENERAL et al
as 1:2010cv01958
Petitioner:
TARIQ L. BELT
Respondent:
OFFICE OF ATTORNEY GENERAL, ERIC HOLDER, U.S. DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MARYLAND BRANCH and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 09-5438
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Belt v. USA-2255
as 1:2009cv03147
Petitioner:
Tariq L. Belt
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv02883
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Belt v. Warden
as 1:2009cv02175
Plaintiff:
Tariq L. Belt
Defendant:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv01431
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv00758
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
