Cases 1 - 10 of 44
Levengood v. Graf et al
as 3:2023cv00196
Petitioner:
Steve Levengood
Respondent:
Pier Hess Graf, Ted Johnson and Pennsylvania Attorney General's Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BALLEW v. DOE
as 1:2023cv00001
Plaintiff:
TED BALLEW
Defendant:
JANE DOE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
BALLEW v. DOE
as 1:2022cv00243
Plaintiff:
TED BALLEW
Defendant:
JANE DOE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
BALLEW v. DOE
as 1:2022cv00148
Plaintiff:
TED BALLEW
Defendant:
JANE DOE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Degilio v. Greek et al
as 3:2022cv00652
Petitioner:
Michael Degilio
Respondent:
Michael S. Greek, Ted Johnson and Pennsylvania Attorney General's Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jewells v. Johnson et al
as 3:2022cv00440
Plaintiff:
Gregorio W. Jewells
Defendant:
Ted Johnson, Jim Kelley, Jennifer Bumbarger and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Richardson v. Clark et al
as 1:2022cv00029
Plaintiff:
Antwan L. Richardson
Defendant:
Brian S. Clark, William W. Young, Doug Macut and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
NOLE v. STATE PAROLE BOARD OF PHILA. et al
as 2:2021cv00630
Respondent:
STATE PAROLE BOARD OF PHILA., TED JOHNSON, The District Attorney of the County of: Philadelphia and others
Plaintiff:
John Nole
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
LAFFERTY v. PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE et al
as 2:2021cv00122
Petitioner:
SHANE LAFFERTY
Respondent:
SHAWN ADAMCZYK, PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE, STEVEN A. ZAPPALA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
HOWARD v. RIHL et al
as 2:2019cv05905
Defendant:
DAVID HECKLER, BRIAN HESSENTHALER, TED KRIMMEL and others
Plaintiff:
BRANDON HOWARD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
