Cases 1 - 10 of 41
Dodd et al v. Zipfel et al
as 1:2022cv00994
Plaintiff:
Brandon C. Dodd and John/Jane Does
Defendant:
Mr. William Zipfel, Mr. William A. Sheron, Jr., Mr. Hoy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cardew v. New York State Department of Corrections and Community Supervision et al
as 9:2022cv00966
Plaintiff:
Robert Cardew
Defendant:
New York State Department of Corrections and Community Supervision, Anthony J. Annucci, Victoria Barber and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Girard v. Barber et al
as 9:2022cv00339
Plaintiff:
Chauncey Girard
Defendant:
Dep Barber, St Louis, Sgt Hanna and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barber v. Howard et al
as 1:2021cv00960
Plaintiff:
Kevin Barber
Defendant:
Timothy Howard, Thomas Diina, Alfonso Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barber v. New York City Department of Corrections
as 1:2021cv04706
Defendant:
New York City Department of Corrections
Plaintiff:
Leonard Barber
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barber v. New York City et al
as 1:2021cv04293
Defendant:
New York City and Department of Corrections
Plaintiff:
Leonard Barber
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rosario v. Hassett et al
as 1:2020cv01818
Defendant:
R. Krajewski, M. Balon, T. G. Barber and others
Plaintiff:
Hickliff Rosario
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Briglin v. Morley et al
as 9:2020cv00614
Defendant:
RN Jane Doe, Corrections Officer "John Doe #2", New York State Department of Corrections and Community Supervision and others
Plaintiff:
Todd R. Briglin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barber v. Howard
as 1:2020cv00461
Petitioner:
Kevin Curtis Barber
Respondent:
Sheriff Timothy Howard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Hill v. LaClair et al
as 9:2020cv00441
Plaintiff:
Derrick Hill and Derrick Troy Hill
Defendant:
Franklin Correctional Facility, V. Barber, F. Quimby and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
