Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Carl v. Dauphin County DA et al
as 1:2022cv01316
Petitioner:
Thomas D. Carl
Respondent:
Dauphin County DA and PA State Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
HOWARD v. KENNY et al
as 2:2022cv02099
Plaintiff:
TROY DEWAYNE HOWARD
Defendant:
THOMAS D. KENNY and KENNY, BURNS & MCGILL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RAMIREZ v. SMITH et al
as 3:2018cv00015
Petitioner:
RENE LOPEZ RAMIREZ
Respondent:
CHRISTIAN SMITH, GREG BRAULEY, THOMAS D. HOMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
SOKHIEV v. SMITH et al
as 3:2017cv00209
Petitioner:
BORIS SOKHIEV
Respondent:
CHRISTIAN SMITH, KATHLEEN BAUSMAN, THOMAS D. HOMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
SOKHIEV v. SMITH et al
as 3:2017cv00160
Petitioner:
BORIS SOKHIEV
Respondent:
CHRISTIAN SMITH, KATHLEEN BAUSMAN, THOMAS D. HOMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Perez-Catalan v. Doll et al
as 1:2017cv01427
Petitioner:
Romulo Perez-Catalan
Respondent:
Clair Doll , Jennifer Ritchey , Thomas D. Homan and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
J.M.V.R. et al v. KELLY et al
as 5:2017cv00703
Petitioner:
J.M.V.R. and ELSA MILAGROS RODRIGUEZ GARCIA
Respondent:
JOHN F. KELLY, JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS, III, THOMAS D. HOMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
J.E.L.M. et al v. KELLY et al
as 5:2017cv00704
Petitioner:
J.E.L.M. and MARIA DELMI MARTINEZ NOLASCO
Respondent:
JOHN F. KELLY, JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS, III, THOMAS D. HOMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Milhouse v. Heath et al
as 1:2015cv01400
Plaintiff:
Kareem Hassan Milhouse
Defendant:
Suzanne Heath, James Fosnot, David Ebbert and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
SANFORD v. SMITH et al
as 2:2013cv01493
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL SANFORD
Defendant:
THOMAS D. WATKINS, RICHARD S. GLASSMAN, DONNA E. BAKER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
