Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Payne v. Collier-TDCJ Executive Director et al
as 1:2018cv00208
Defendant:
FNU Almanza, FNU LNU, Kevin D Foley and others
Plaintiff:
Toby Kristopher Payne
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Payne v. Almanza et al
as 1:2018cv00175
Defendant:
Unknown Correctional Officers, FNU Almanza, Steven A Sperry and others
Plaintiff:
Toby Kristopher Payne
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Payne v. Appleton et al
as 1:2018cv00063
Plaintiff:
Toby Kristopher Payne
Defendant:
Scott Appleton and Jessie Singh
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Payne v. Appleton et al
as 2:2018cv00083
Plaintiff:
Toby Kristopher Payne
Defendant:
Scott Appleton and Jessie Singh
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Payne v. Sutterfield, et al
as 2:2018cv00084
Plaintiff:
Toby Kristopher Payne
Defendant:
James Sutterfield, FNU Nguyen and FNU Garcia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Payne v. Sutterfield, et al
as 1:2018cv00070
Plaintiff:
Toby Kristopher Payne
Defendant:
James Sutterfield, FNU Nguyen and FNU Garcia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Payne v. Dewitt et al
as 1:2018cv00048
Plaintiff:
Toby Kristopher Payne
Defendant:
Michael D. Dewitt, Dustin A Twombly, Justin M O'Connor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Payne v. Sutterfield et al
as 2:2017cv00211
Plaintiff:
Toby Kristopher Payne
Defendant:
James Sutterfield, Jason M Hardegree, Damon B Andrews and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Toby Payne v. William Stephens, Director
as 15-40535
Petitioner - Appellant:
TOBY KRISTOPHER PAYNE
Respondent - Appellee:
WILLIAM STEPHENS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Toby Payne v. William Stephens, Director
as 14-10921
Petitioner - Appellant:
TOBY KRISTOPHER PAYNE
Respondent - Appellee:
WILLIAM STEPHENS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
