Cases 1 - 10 of 139
McKerchie #632622 v. Wrigglesworth et al
as 1:2023cv01319
Plaintiff:
Michael D. McKerchie #632622
Defendant:
Scott Wrigglesworth, Andrew Bouck, Darin Southworth and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McKerchie #632622 v. Doerr et al
as 1:2023cv01195
Plaintiff:
Michael D. McKerchie #632622
Defendant:
Scott Wrigglesworth, Andrew Bouck, Darin Southworth and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Revilla v. Reich
as 1:2023cv00469
Petitioner:
Julian Revilla
Respondent:
Tom Reich
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Adams #462766 v. Poupard et al
as 2:2023cv00047
Plaintiff:
David Adams #462766
Defendant:
Jay Poupard, Kristopher Taskila, Richard D. Russell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Reilly v. St. Clair County et al
as 2:2022cv11952
Plaintiff:
Jamie Reilly
Defendant:
St. Clair County, St. Clair County Jail, St. Clair County Commissioners and others
Stovall #601852 v. Prisk et al
as 2:2022cv00146
Plaintiff:
Larry M. Stovall #601852
Defendant:
Tom Prisk and Doug Tasson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Marks v. LaJoye - Young et al
as 1:2022cv00288
Plaintiff:
Cedric Marks
Defendant:
Michelle LaJoye - Young, Grand Rapids, City of, Chuck DeWitt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carlton #113154 v. Lebo et al
as 1:2021cv00981
Plaintiff:
Edward Nathaniel Carlton #113154
Defendant:
Tom Lebo, Unknown Dine, Unknown Burns and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Love #751758 v. Davids et al
as 1:2020cv00287
Defendant:
B. Stevenson, Dr. Unknown Chung, John Davids and others
Plaintiff:
Deon Love #751758
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gollnick v. State of Michigan et al
as 1:2020cv10645
Defendant:
Joe Williams, Michelle A. Bianchi, Aline Nass and others
Plaintiff:
Steven John Gollnick
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
