Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00166
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00125
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv05530
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv06410
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
CEBALLOS-QUINTANILLA et al v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY ("DHS") et al
as 5:2016cv00118
Petitioner:
FANY YAKELIN CEBALLOS-QUINTANILLA and L.Y.T.C.
Respondent:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY ("DHS"), U.S. CUSTOMS AND BORDER PROTECTION ("CBP"), U.S. CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES ("USCIS") and others
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1105
GRANT v. UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES (USCIS)
as 3:2013cv00106
Plaintiff:
ANDRE EVERTON GRANT
Defendant:
UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES (USCIS)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
THOMAS v. HOLDER et al
as 2:2012cv02692
Petitioner:
NORMAN ANTHONY THOMAS
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER and USCIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
DORCANT v. DHS/ICE et al
as 3:2011cv00003
Plaintiff:
HUBERT DORCANT
Defendant:
DHS/ICE, ERIC HOLDER and UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES (USCIS)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv00938
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv02611
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
