Cases 1 - 10 of 42
LEE v. UNITED STATES MARSHAL SERVICE
as 7:2023cv00134
Petitioner:
JAI DEVON LEE
Respondent:
UNITED STATES MARSHAL SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plunkett v. Ward et al
as 5:2023cv00065
Plaintiff:
Stephen Christopher Plunkett
Defendant:
TIMOTHY C WARD, Damon Henninger, William Danforth and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wearing v. Robert A. Deyton Detention et al
as 1:2022cv03497
Plaintiff:
Rashad Andre Wearing
Defendant:
Robert A. Deyton Detention, GEO Group Incorporated, Warden Charles Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Prisoner Civil Rights
SIMMONS v. PAULK et al
as 7:2022cv00051
Petitioner:
KEVIN SIMMONS
Respondent:
Warden PAULK and UNITED STATES MARSHALS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
JAMISON v. UNITED STATES MARSHAL'S SERVICE et al
as 5:2019cv00457
Plaintiff:
TEO A JAMISON
Defendant:
BUTTS COUNTY DETENTION CENTER, STATE OF GEORGIA, SOUTHERN CORRECTIONAL MEDICAL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2017cv00135
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00139
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2017cv00137
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Banks v. Forbes et al
as 1:2017cv01861
Petitioner:
Frederick Banks
Respondent:
Kelly Forbes, United States Marshals Service, Mark Hornak and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Griffin v. State of Georgia et al
as 4:2017cv00077
Plaintiff:
Theodore Keith Griffin
Defendant:
State of Georgia, Delta Airlines, TSA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
