Cases 1 - 10 of 1,765
Walberry v. USA
as 1:2024cv00553
Petitioner:
Nicholas Walberry
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
MORA v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2024cv00604
Plaintiff:
ORLANDO MORA
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2674 Federal Tort Claims Act
MAYS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA (WARDEN AT F.C.I - THOMSON)
as 1:2024cv02212
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA (WARDEN AT F.C.I - THOMSON)
Plaintiff:
WALTER L. MAYS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
DIAL v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2024cv00597
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, NEFF, GOODMAN and others
Plaintiff:
SHAUNDELLE DIAL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
PHARRIS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2024cv02167
Petitioner:
GLEN PHARRIS
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 st Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
CAVAZOS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2024cv02047
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff:
JUAN ANTONIO CAVAZOS, JR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2674 Federal Tort Claims Act
MOBLEY v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 3:2024cv00201
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Petitioner:
SEROY MOBLEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Jones-Gunn v. USA
as 3:2024cv00876
Petitioner:
Johnnie Jones-Gunn
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Hatley v. USA
as 2:2024cv00368
Petitioner:
Lavelle Hatley
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Brown v. United States of America
as 2:2024cv00354
Petitioner:
Terrance Brown
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
