Cases 1 - 10 of 44
Gabaldon v. The GEO Group Facility et al
as 2:2019cv00808
Defendant:
P. Aragon, FNU Rivera, The GEO Group Facility and others
Plaintiff:
Danan Bernardo Gabaldon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Caouette v. New Mexico Corrections Department, et al
as 2:2018cv00853
Plaintiff:
Daniel Caouette
Defendant:
New Mexico Corrections Dept, FNU LNU, Ms Chavez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Amaro v. Horton et al
as 1:2017cv00898
Petitioner:
Pedro J. Amaro
Respondent:
V. Horton and New Mexico Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Chavez v. State of New Mexico et al
as 1:2017cv00756
Petitioner:
Stevan Chavez
Respondent:
State of New Mexico, V. Horton and Second Judicial District
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Marker v. Horton et al
as 1:2017cv00508
Petitioner:
Warren B. Marker
Respondent:
V. Horton and Hector Balderas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Cunningham v. Horton et al
as 1:2017cv00354
Petitioner:
Danny A. Cunningham
Respondent:
V. Horton and Attorney General of the State of New Mexico
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Martinez v. Horton et al
as 1:2016cv01280
Petitioner:
Jason Martinez
Respondent:
V. Horton and Hector Balderas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Gentry Smith v. V. Horton, et al
as 15-60227
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GENTRY TRE-MAINE SMITH
Defendant - Appellee:
V. HORTON, Warden at East Mississippi Correctional Facility, GEO GROUP, INCORPORATED, Operator of East Mississippi Correctional Facility, BART GRIMES, Warden at East Mississippi Correctional Facility and others
KIMBROUGH v. LANE et al
as 5:2014cv00356
Plaintiff:
LARANCE KIMBROUGH
Defendant:
L K LANE, W K BURCH and V HORTON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Arevalo v. M.T.C. et al
as 4:2013cv00083
Plaintiff:
William Arevalo
Defendant:
M.T.C., GEO Group Inc., D. McDonald and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
