Cases 1 - 10 of 30
OLIVIO-VAZQUEZ v. PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2023cv04596
Plaintiff:
CARLOS OLIVIO-VAZQUEZ
Defendant:
PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER NESMITH, SERGEANT MCLEAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
VAZQUEZ v. RIVELLO
as 2:2023cv02579
Petitioner:
JOSE VAZQUEZ
Respondent:
JOHN RIVELLO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
VAZQUEZ v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2023cv00175
Plaintiff:
JOEZIEL VAZQUEZ
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
CAMPBELL v. DUNIO et al
as 3:2022cv00071
Plaintiff:
DWIGHT CAMPBELL
Defendant:
MATTHEW DUNIO, PETER WEEKS, JESSICA WEIL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
HACKETT v. DUNIO et al
as 3:2021cv00203
Plaintiff:
CORY L. HACKETT
Defendant:
PTLM MATTHEW DUNIO and ALEX VAZQUEZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Vazquez v. Warden of SCI-Dallas et al
as 3:2021cv01928
Petitioner:
Danny Vazquez
Respondent:
Warden of SCI-Dallas and Pennsylvania Attorney General's Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
VAZQUEZ v. THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA-COMMONWEALTH
as 5:2021cv04179
Plaintiff:
DANNY RIVAS VAZQUEZ
Defendant:
THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA-COMMONWEALTH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Vazquez v. Quay
as 1:2021cv01049
Petitioner:
Justin Vazquez
Respondent:
Warden H. Quay
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Vazquez v. Wetzel et al
as 4:2021cv00164
Respondent:
John E. Wetzel, Pennsylvania Attorney General's Office, Warden of SCI-Houtzdale and others
Petitioner:
Jesus Vazquez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
VAZQUEZ v. MCGINLEY et al
as 1:2021cv00150
Plaintiff:
Jose Javier Vazquez
Defendant:
The Department of Corrections, JUSTICE Giovanni O. Campbell, Thomas S McGinley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
