Cases 1 - 10 of 12
VINSON v. GARLAND
as 5:2024cv00063
Petitioner:
JASON MORGAN VINSON
Respondent:
MERRICK GARLAND, JOY ODOM, MARC T TREADWELL and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Sapp v. Williams et al
as 1:2022cv00087
Plaintiff:
Alton Sharan Sapp
Defendant:
Sheriff Alfonzo Williams, Jason Vinson, James Kelly and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
RIDLEY v. HAYSLIP et al
as 1:2022cv00082
Plaintiff:
EDWARD TYRONE RIDLEY
Defendant:
CLERK TARA HAYSLIP, CLERK CONNIE TAYLOR, SHERIFF BILLY HANCOCK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FORD v. JANUARY et al
as 5:2021cv00007
Defendant:
DETECTIVE EVERETT D JANUARY, DETECTIVE PHILLIP CARL VINSON and OFFICER SCOTT ROGERS
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH FORD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cowan v. Williams et al
as 1:2019cv00034
Defendant:
Ashley Marsh, Wilbert Williams, John H. Bush and others
Plaintiff:
Markus A. Lown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Havron v. Watkins-Vinson et al
as 1:2017cv00831
Plaintiff:
Gerald William Havron
Defendant:
Courtney Watkins-Vinson, Stephen P. Morgan and Terry E. Barnard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2016cv00297
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Bey v. Paulding County Superior Court et al
as 4:2016cv00194
Plaintiff:
Malichi Z Bey
Defendant:
Paulding County Superior Court, Jimmy Farr, Lisa Bang and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bey v. Hiram Police Dept. et al
as 4:2016cv00193
Plaintiff:
Malichi Z Bey
Defendant:
Hiram Police Dept., Paulding County Sheriff Office, Paulding County Superior Court and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WHATLEY v BRENDEN BROWN et al
as 5:2014cv00295
Plaintiff:
VINSON EDWARD WHATLEY
Defendant:
BRENDEN BROWN, BELINDA BROWN and MIZELL DAVIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
