Cases 1 - 10 of 277
Thornton v. Wellpath et al
as 0:2024cv00053
Plaintiff:
Michael Thornton
Defendant:
Wellpath, W. Whitney, Srinath Kamineni and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Brown v. Hughes
as 3:2024cv00062
Petitioner:
Kenneth W. Brown
Respondent:
Craig Hughes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Salyers v. Robey
as 4:2023cv00045
Petitioner:
Cecil W. Salyers
Respondent:
Amy Robey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Daniels v. Crall et al
as 0:2023cv00037
Plaintiff:
John Larry Daniels and David W. WIlliams
Defendant:
Doug Crall, Federic Kemen, Lacy Russell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Stone v. Smith et al
as 1:2023cv00036
Plaintiff:
Jackie Wayne Stone and Jackie W. Stone
Defendant:
Barry T. Smith, Taylor County Detention Center, Hack Marcum and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hinkle v. Thomas et al
as 3:2023cv00069
Plaintiff:
Kevin DeShawn Hinkle
Defendant:
Alex W. Thomas and Zhiirkane James
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hinkle v. Lindsey
as 3:2023cv00067
Plaintiff:
Kevin DeShawn Hinkle
Defendant:
Demetrius W. Lindsey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Spragans v. USA et al
as 7:2023cv00008
Plaintiff:
Shawan I. Spragans
Defendant:
USA, Mr. L. T. Moore, Ms. Gray and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Austin v. Franklin County, Kentucky et al
as 3:2022cv00068
Plaintiff:
Anthony W. Austin
Defendant:
Franklin County, Kentucky, Chris Quire, Nathan M. Doty and others
Debtor:
John Does
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
King v. USA
as 5:2022cv00317
Petitioner:
Anthony W. King
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
