Cases 1 - 10 of 12
RODGERS v. HARRY
as 3:2023cv00196
Petitioner:
JAMES FRANKLIN RODGERS
Respondent:
LAUREL R. HARRY, KEN HOLLIBAUGH and ADA PETER WEEKS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
CAMPBELL v. DUNIO et al
as 3:2022cv00071
Plaintiff:
DWIGHT CAMPBELL
Defendant:
MATTHEW DUNIO, PETER WEEKS, JESSICA WEIL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Ansley v. Wetzel et al
as 1:2021cv00528
Defendant:
Ms. Learn, Unit Manager Dunn, Security Lt. Stuvola and others
Plaintiff:
Lawrence O. Ansley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CLARK v. BLAIR COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEYS OFFICE et al
as 3:2020cv00169
Plaintiff:
WILLIS T. CLARK
Defendant:
BLAIR COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEYS OFFICE, RANDY FEATHERS and PETER J. WEEKS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
SOWELL v. BLAIR COUNTY COURTHOUSE EMPLOYEES et al
as 3:2020cv00058
Defendant:
ALTOONA POLICE DEPARTMENT, HONORABLE BENJAMIN JONES, PETER WEEKS and others
Plaintiff:
MARKALE A. SOWELL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
STEVENS v. BLAIR COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 3:2018cv00085
Plaintiff:
PHILLIP A. STEVENS
Defendant:
BLAIR COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA , FREDRICK MILLER , PAULA AIGNER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
STEVENS v. BLAIR COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 2:2018cv01577
Plaintiff:
PHILLIP A. STEVENS
Defendant:
BLAIR COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA, FREDRICK MILLER, PAULA AIGNER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Weeks v. Link et al
as 4:2016cv00084
Petitioner:
Jermaine Weeks
Respondent:
Cynthia Link and PA Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Weeks v. Link et al
as 4:2015cv02211
Petitioner:
Jermaine Weeks
Respondent:
Cynthia Link and PA Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Weeks v. Holt et al
as 3:2008cv02057
Petitioner:
Newell D. Weeks
Respondent:
Ronnie Holt
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
