Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Jackson #622337 v. Surety et al
as 2:2023cv00133
Plaintiff:
Andre Jackson #622337
Defendant:
Unknown Surety, Unknown Bensel, A. Hetrick and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Grady-Wilkins #605313 v. Newton et al
as 1:2023cv00282
Plaintiff:
Jake Darnell Grady-Wilkins #605313
Defendant:
Unknown Newton, Kent County Correctional Facility and Kent, County of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wilkins #578540 v. Taskila
as 1:2022cv00427
Petitioner:
Benjamin Roy Wilkins #578540
Respondent:
Kristopher Taskila
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wilkins #578540 v. Taskila
as 2:2022cv00091
Petitioner:
Benjamin Ray Wilkins #578540
Respondent:
Kristopher Taskila
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rouse et al v. Michigan Parole Board et al
as 5:2021cv12670
Plaintiff:
Arthur J. Rouse, John Moore, David Sarfo and others
Defendant:
Michigan Parole Board, State of Michigan, MDOC and others
Wilkins #759458 v. Corizon of Michigan et al
as 1:2021cv00793
Defendant:
Corizon of Michigan, Corizon Health Inc., Bryan Morrison and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Wilkins #759458
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wilkins #759458 v. Kawalski et al
as 1:2020cv01057
Defendant:
Unknown Michelle, Unknown Kline, Unknown Kawalski and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Wilkins #759458
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wilkins #769141 v. Horton
as 2:2020cv00042
Petitioner:
Najee Sharif Wilkins #769141
Respondent:
Connie Horton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Williams #225280 v. Washington et al
as 2:2018cv00144
Defendant:
Unknown Dewit, Unknown Bigger, Michael McClean and others
Plaintiff:
Donnell Williams #225280
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Spearman #320836 v. Heyns et al
as 2:2015cv00015
Plaintiff:
Rufus L. Spearman #320836
Defendant:
Daniel H. Heyns, Richard D. Russell, Unknown Part(y)(ies) and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
