Cases 1 - 10 of 84
Austin v. SCI-Dallas Mailroom Staff et al
as 4:2024cv00886
Plaintiff:
Shaun Austin
Defendant:
SCI-Dallas Mailroom Staff and Former Superintendent Ransom
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Haitos v. Hainsworth et al
as 1:2024cv00372
Petitioner:
Austin Patrick Haitos
Respondent:
Melissa Hainsworth and Pennsylvania Attorney General's Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hall v. Wapinsky et al
as 1:2023cv02119
Plaintiff:
Austin Hall
Defendant:
David Wapinsky, Buchanan, Bowman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BRADLEY v. HOWICK
as 1:2023cv00317
Plaintiff:
VERNON BRADLEY
Defendant:
Dr. HOWICK, PA ELLIE, CHCA JANA SMITH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
TISDALE v. PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2023cv01972
Plaintiff:
NAISHA TISDALE
Defendant:
PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, MARK BROTHERS, KEVIN RANSOM and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Reed v. Smith et al
as 1:2023cv01837
Plaintiff:
Jalil S. Reed
Defendant:
Smith, Austin, Joseph Terra and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BYRD v. HARPER et al
as 2:2023cv01726
Plaintiff:
JAMES T. BYRD and Al-Tariq Sharif Ali Byrd
Defendant:
WARDEN ORLANDO HARPER, CHIEF DEPUTY LAURA K. WILLIAMS, DEPUTY DAVID ZETWO, JR. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Carr v. USA
as 1:2023cv01435
Petitioner:
Austin Carr
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Carr v. USA
as 1:2023cv01436
Petitioner:
Austin Carr
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
BROWN v. ZOTEK et al
as 2:2023cv01944
Plaintiff:
RAYMOND C. BROWN
Defendant:
SHERIFF SGT. ZOTEK, DEPUTY SHERIFF AUSTIN and DEPUTY SHERIFF FYNES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
