Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Jackson v. Shelley et al
as 9:2023cv00362
Plaintiff:
Marcus Jackson
Defendant:
Toby Shelley, William Fitzpatrick, Marc A. Rothschild and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ruggiero v. Rogers et al
as 1:2023cv00229
Plaintiff:
Anthony Ruggiero
Defendant:
Donald D. Rogers, Mark E. Carrow, Joseph H. Noeth and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FITZPATRICK v. KNIGHT
as 1:2022cv05847
Petitioner:
BRYAN WILLIAM FITZPATRICK
Respondent:
STEVIE KNIGHT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Kielly v. Fitzpatrick
as 9:2020cv00148
Defendant:
William Fitzpatrick and Anthony Annucci
Plaintiff:
Sara Kielly
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Dougherty et al
as 9:2017cv00472
Defendant:
Deputy Aponte, William Fitzpatrick, Stephen Dougherty and others
Plaintiff:
Randy Laquawn Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Godley v. Onondaga County et al
as 1:2016cv00825
Plaintiff:
Erick Godley
Defendant:
Onondaga County, Ann Rether, William Fitzpatrick and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FITZPATRICK v. BERGEN COUNTY et al
as 2:2013cv00580
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM FITZPATRICK
Defendant:
DAWN BREEDEN, JOHN DOE #1, LAW LIBRARY SUPERVISOR and DAVIES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stewart v. The State of New York et al
as 9:2012cv00069
Defendant:
The State of New York, Shambo, Devereaux and others
Plaintiff:
Terrance T Stewart
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Falkowski et al
as 9:2011cv00826
Plaintiff:
Mileke Williams
Defendant:
E. Falkowski, J. Ballagh, City of Syracuse and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson v. Kapral et al
as 9:2007cv00554
Plaintiff:
Tommy R. Jackson, Jr.
Defendant:
Scot Kapral, Joe Langevin, Newman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
