Cases 1 - 10 of 22
WOODY et al v. REAGLE et al
as 1:2023cv02315
Plaintiff:
BRANDON WOODY, ANTHONY WHITE, MARCO WEBSTER and others
Defendant:
DENNIS REAGLE, MAGGIE BRYANT, CENTURION HEALTH OF INDIANA, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wall v. Warden
as 3:2023cv00787
Petitioner:
Michael D Wall
Respondent:
Warden
Not Classified By Court:
WESTVILLE E-FILE(Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
KNOBELACH v. MILLER et al
as 2:2023cv00387
Plaintiff:
BRYSON L. KNOBELOCH and NEVAEH OLIVIA KNOBELOCH
Defendant:
MILLER, GOSSETT, LEE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FARAFONOV v. NWOSISI et al
as 1:2022cv01099
Plaintiff:
ANDREY M FARAFONOV
Defendant:
IFUNEAYA LICHENA NWOSISI, RYAN WILSON MEARS, MICHELL WAYMIRE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McLeod v. Bowen et al
as 3:2020cv00525
Plaintiff:
Bradley McLeod
Defendant:
Bowen, James Henry, SBCRC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wall v. Warden
as 3:2020cv00466
Respondent:
Warden
Petitioner:
Michael D Wall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Ashcraft v. Carter et al
as 3:2019cv00303
Defendant:
Eakins, Captain Smiley, John Harvil and others
Not Yet Classified:
WESTVILLE E-FILE(Court Use Only)
Plaintiff:
John Ashcraft and John W Ashcraft
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Isby v. Sevier et al
as 4:2019cv00001
Defendant:
C Samargin, Stone, Jason English and others
Plaintiff:
Aaron Isby
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hale et al v. Stoffel
as 1:2017cv00108
Plaintiff:
Thomas Hale and Justin Walls
Defendant:
Terry Stoffel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mayweathers-Brown v. Rodgers et al
as 3:2014cv01846
Plaintiff:
Quintin J Mayweathers-Brown
Defendant:
Brad Rodgers, Curtis Hill, Stephany Biggler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
