Cases 1 - 10 of 323
Molina v. Borik et al
as 7:2024cv00079
Plaintiff:
Herrado J. Molina
Defendant:
Michelle C. Borik, Isatu Bangura, Bobby L. Adams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jennings v. Ward County
as 4:2024cv00018
Plaintiff:
Prince George Crowling Jennings
Defendant:
Ward County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Sanders v. Ward et al
as 7:2024cv00027
Defendant:
Heather W. Pederson, Ingrid Y. Ward, Gregory S. Hicks and others
Plaintiff:
James E Sanders
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gonzales v. Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutional Division et al
as 7:2024cv00003
Plaintiff:
Henry Gonzales
Defendant:
Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutional Division, Brian Collier, Jimmy S. Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rios v. Meyer et al
as 5:2023cv00302
Plaintiff:
John Gabriel Rios
Defendant:
Brent Meyer, Wanda Mason, Derek Hester and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ward v. USA
as 2:2023cv00183
Petitioner:
Chelsea Kay Ward
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Ward v. Bridges
as 9:2023cv00193
Plaintiff:
Derek Clinton Ward
Defendant:
Sheriff Jason Bridges
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Sossamon v. Smith et al
as 7:2023cv00110
Plaintiff:
Harvey Leroy Sossamon, III
Defendant:
Kevin Smith, Jimmy S. Smith, Christopher Wiedau and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ward v. Bridges
as 9:2023cv00167
Plaintiff:
Derek Clinton Ward
Defendant:
Sheriff Jason Bridges
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ward v. Brandes
as 4:2023cv02968
Petitioner:
Terri Ward, Jr.
Respondent:
Jack W. Brandes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
