Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in District of Columbia
Cases 1 - 10 of 26
GASTONG v. SCOTT et al
as 1:2022cv01635
Plaintiff: HARRELL A. GASTONG, IV
Defendant: MONIQUE M SCOTT, ANDREW H WARREN, JULIEANNE M HOLT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HASKEW v. WARREN
as 1:2019cv03332
Petitioner: JOHN MICHAEL HASKEW
Respondent: ELIZABETH WARREN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
DENT v. BARR et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2019cv02189
Defendant: J. F. CARAWAY, FRANK LARA, BUNKER and others
Plaintiff: JASON DENT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
MIECZKOWSKI v. CITY OF WARREN STATE OF MICHIGAN 37RD JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT et al
as 1:2019cv02095
Defendant: CITY OF OAK PARK, STATE OF MICHIGAN 45TH DISTRICT COURT, CITY OF NEW BALTIMORE, STATE OF MICHIGAN 42TH DISTRICT COURT, CITY OF ROSEVILLE, STATE OF MICHIGAN 39TH DISTRICT COURT and others
Plaintiff: JAMES WAYNE MIECZKOWSKI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv01203
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
WARREN v. BOLSTER et al
as 1:2018cv00446
Petitioner: MORRIS J. WARREN
Defendant: MARK BOLSTER, J. RAY ORMOND and UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
LOMAX v. USA
as 1:2017cv02054
Respondent: USA
Petitioner: EARL WARREN LOMAX
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
LEE v. YOUNG et al
as 1:2017cv00989
Plaintiff: WARREN ANTONIO LEE
Defendant: LISA YOUNG, URSULA GILLIUM and DOUGLAS E. WILLIS
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
ROSEBAR et al v. BROOKS et al
as 1:2017cv00978
Plaintiff: MICHAEL ROSEBAR and ERIN ROSEBAR
Defendant: DAVID BROOKS, WENDELL ROBINSON, WILLIAM C. JOHNSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WARREN v CCA CORPORATION, INC. et al
as 1:2017cv00059
Plaintiff: JAMES A. WARREN
Defendant: CCA CORPORATION, INC., CENTRAL TREATMENT FACILITY, CHARLIE PETERSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?