Cases 1 - 10 of 94
Strickland v. Balderama
as 3:2024cv05487
Plaintiff:
Joshua Wayne Strickland
Defendant:
Miguel Balderama
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fletcher v. Golightly et al
as 2:2024cv00611
Plaintiff:
Tayjuan Trevion-Wayne Fletcher
Defendant:
Mary Golightly, T Craw and Echos
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Doane v. Whatcom County Jail et al
as 2:2024cv00421
Plaintiff:
Michael Wayne Doane
Defendant:
Whatcom County Jail, Martin Dubek and Brianna
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fletcher v. Redman et al
as 3:2024cv05216
Plaintiff:
Tayjuan Trevion-Wayne Fletcher
Defendant:
Jennifer Redman, Yvonne Umu and Shawn Northcut
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fletcher v. Hurt et al
as 2:2024cv00357
Petitioner:
Tayjuan Trevion-Wayne Fletcher
Defendant:
John Hurt and L Barns
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fletcher v. Hurt et al
as 2:2024cv00352
Plaintiff:
Tayjuan Trevion-Wayne Fletcher
Defendant:
John Hurt and Phillip Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bosarge v. Pierce County et al
as 3:2024cv05159
Plaintiff:
Christopher Milton Wayne Bosarge
Defendant:
Pierce County, Pierce County Council, Ed Troyer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fletcher v. Coleman et al
as 2:2024cv00129
Defendant:
Tina McCraw, Suzan Coleman, John Hurt and others
Plaintiff:
Tayjuan Trevion-Wayne Fletcher
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Streetman v. United States of America
as 2:2023cv00263
Petitioner:
Dan Wayne Streetman
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Jennings v. Haynes
as 2:2023cv00231
Petitioner:
John Wayne Jennings
Respondent:
Ronald Haynes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
