Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Troy v. Galipeau et al
as 1:2024cv00131
Plaintiff:
Ramel Theodore Troy, Ramel T. Troy and Ramel Troy
Defendant:
Niraj Bhalakia, J. Galipeau, Gary Lewis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Troy v. Galipeau et al
as 3:2024cv00275
Plaintiff:
Ramel Theodore Troy, Ramel T. Troy and Ramel Troy
Defendant:
Niraj Bhalakia, J. Galipeau, Gary Lewis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Murphy v. Hoejke et al
as 1:2022cv00136
Defendant:
Beth A Webber, Lisa Hoejke, Danielle Corcoran and others
Plaintiff:
Zachary Steven Murphy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Collicott v. Noble County Jail et al
as 1:2020cv00234
Defendant:
Lucas Allen, Corporal Charlotte, Max C Weber and others
Plaintiff:
Brendan D Collicott
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TAYLOR v. BROWN et al
as 2:2020cv00191
Defendant:
B. TRIMBLE, FISCHER, HARDBALL and others
Plaintiff:
JOSHUA TAYLOR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wallen v. Polley et al
as 1:2019cv00535
Plaintiff:
Jason Robert Wallen
Defendant:
Jerry Weber, Doug Harp, Michael Polley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Collins v. Lock et al
as 1:2019cv00048
Defendant:
Jerry Weber and Tanner Lock
Plaintiff:
Elliott Collins, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
KING v. BURISS et al
as 2:2008cv00376
Plaintiff:
JIMMY LEE KING
Defendant:
CHARLES BURISS, TONY BAUER, CHRIS GALLAGHER and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
HAMMER v. WEBSTER et al
as 2:2008cv00040
Plaintiff:
DAVID PAUL HAMMER
Defendant:
THOMAS A WEBSTER, JULIE BEIGHLY, PRASHANTHI REDDY-BOLLA and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
JANIS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2007cv00090
Plaintiff:
GUST MARION JANIS
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, ALBERTO GONZALEZ and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
