Cases 1 - 10 of 75
(PC) Webster v. Fletcher et al
as 2:2024cv01479
Plaintiff:
Nathan Webster
Defendant:
Fletcher and Patterson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lee v. Borla
as 3:2024cv02811
Petitioner:
Webster Lee
Respondent:
Warden Edward Borla
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Daniel Webster Johnson v. Unknown Correctional Officer et al
as 2:2023cv06583
Plaintiff:
Daniel Webster Johnson, II
Defendant:
Unknown Correctional Officer, Attorney General and DPS Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Gradford v. Velasco et al
as 1:2022cv01493
Plaintiff:
William J. Gradford
Defendant:
F. Velasco and T. Webster
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Webster v. Look
as 2:2022cv01010
Plaintiff:
Lee A. Webster
Defendant:
J. J. Looks and J. J. Look
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Webster S. Lucas v. Attorney General
as 2:2021cv08996
Petitioner:
Webster S. Lucas
Defendant:
Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Richard v. Webster et al
as 5:2021cv02325
Plaintiff:
Darelle Tyreece Richard
Defendant:
Deputy Belen, Deputy Ng, Deputy Gutierrez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Daniel W. Johnson II v. Robert E. Record et al
as 2:2020cv08362
Plaintiff:
Daniel Webster Johnson, II
Defendant:
Unknown Correctional Officer, Warden at CSP-LAC at Lancaster, Robert E. Record and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Saif'ullah v. Johnson & Johnson Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 5:2020cv02844
Plaintiff:
Khalifah E.D. Saif'ullah and Fernando A. Jackson
Defendant:
San Quentin State Prison, Johnson & Johnson Ethicon, Inc., California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Gradford v. Velasco et al
as 1:2020cv00543
Defendant:
F. Velasco and T. Webster
Plaintiff:
William J. Gradford
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
