Cases 1 - 10 of 87
Strong v. Dallas County Commission et al
as 2:2024cv00105
Defendant:
Elizabeth Daniels, Dallas County Commission, Dallas County Sheriff's Department and others
Plaintiff:
Denise Strong
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
VanPelt v. Warden
as 7:2023cv01550
Petitioner:
Hunter VanPelt
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Madden v. Turman et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2023cv00249
Plaintiff:
Hunter Madden
Defendant:
Blake Turman, Thomas Hugghins and Vikki Boyett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hunter v. Turman et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2023cv00270
Plaintiff:
Justin Hunter
Defendant:
Blake Turman, Thomas Hugghins and Vikki Boyett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hunter v. Wade et al
as 1:2022cv00474
Petitioner:
Otis Lee Hunter
Respondent:
Matthew Wade and Attorney General of the State of Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Hunter v. Breining et al
as 1:2022cv00146
Plaintiff:
Eddie L. Hunter
Defendant:
Cpl. Brewing, Sat. Aronld, Cpl. Faulkner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jacobs v. Jones et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2021cv00366
Defendant:
Brittany L. Marshall, Patrice Richie Jones, J. Robbins and others
Plaintiff:
Alvin Roy Jacobs
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fortenbury v. Butler et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2020cv01004
Defendant:
John Crow, Cheryl Price, Reosha Butler and others
Plaintiff:
Melvin DeWayne Fortenbury
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clarke v. Butler et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2020cv00902
Defendant:
Wexford Health Sources, Inc., Reosha Butler, Jefferson S. Dunn and others
Plaintiff:
Wellington Emanuel Clarke
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hunter v. Bloom et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2020cv00900
Defendant:
John K. Larkins, III and Beth Bloom
Plaintiff:
Jason T. Hunter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
