Cases 1 - 10 of 238
Johnson v. Bennett
as 2:2024cv01200
Respondent:
Jason Bennett
Petitioner:
James L Johnson, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Johnson v. Bennett
as 2:2024cv00265
Respondent:
Jason Bennett
Petitioner:
James Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Johnson v. State of Washington
as 3:2024cv05542
Petitioner:
Christopher Johnson
Respondent:
State of Washington
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Brooks v. Gallagher et al
as 4:2024cv05028
Plaintiff:
Carl Alonzo Brooks
Defendant:
K Gallagher, Lisa Robtoy, Lori Ramsdellgilkey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Securus Technologies
as 4:2024cv05004
Plaintiff:
Harvey S Johnson
Defendant:
Securus Technologies
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brooks v. Tenney et al
as 4:2023cv05163
Plaintiff:
Carl Alonzo Brooks
Defendant:
Nancy Tenney, Corey Endo, K. Gallagher and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bryan v. State of Washington et al
as 3:2023cv06042
Plaintiff:
Richard Wesley Bryan
Defendant:
Shauna Johnson, Alison H Sonntag, Amber and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Snohomish County et al
as 2:2023cv01378
Plaintiff:
Travon Deautry Lee Johnson and Travon Johnson
Defendant:
Officer Leyden, Officer Officer Navarro, Snohomish county sherrif and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Johnson v. Bennett
as 3:2023cv05585
Petitioner:
Melvin Marcus Johnson, Jr
Respondent:
Jason Bennett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jones v. Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2023cv05572
Plaintiff:
Bartholomew Lee Jones
Defendant:
Department of Corrections, Steve Cinclair, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
