Cases 1 - 10 of 47
Livingston v. Greene et al
as 3:2023cv03219
Plaintiff:
Douglas Livingston
Defendant:
Brittany Greene, Lisa Williams, Everette Turner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bowen v. LaShelle et al
as 4:2022cv04182
Plaintiff:
Everett Bowen
Defendant:
Bryan LaShelle and Ashley Flores
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tammons v. Strubberg et al
as 3:2022cv01414
Plaintiff:
Norman Lee Tammons
Defendant:
Lieutenant Strubberg, Lieutenant Bujnak, Sergeant Moore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Padilla v. Pritzker et al
as 1:2022cv01217
Plaintiff:
Carlos Padilla, III, Everett Clinton, Keith Beard and others
Defendant:
J B Pritzker, Rob Jeffries, Cherryl Hinthorne and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Everett v. Garden et al
as 3:2022cv00631
Plaintiff:
Bobby D. Everett, Jr.
Defendant:
Andy Garden, Troy Reed and B. Carter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Tammons v. St. Clair County Jail
as 3:2022cv00244
Plaintiff:
Norman Lee Tammons
Defendant:
St. Clair County Jail, Cathy MacElroy, Janelle Bloodworth and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Prindable v. Everett et al
as 3:2022cv00254
Plaintiff:
Luke A. Prindable
Defendant:
C/O Everett, C/O Briggs, Richard Watson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Headrick v. Chambers et al
as 3:2022cv00185
Plaintiff:
Timothy James Headrick
Defendant:
Sgt. Chambers, C/O Brown, C/O Jordan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Everett v. Gomez et al
as 1:2021cv03478
Respondent:
David Gomez
Petitioner:
Christopher Deshawn Everett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Lowery v. Everett
as 3:2021cv00537
Respondent:
Mike Everett
Petitioner:
Donald E. Lowery
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
