Cases 1 - 10 of 26
Fuentes v. Salisbury
as 1:2023cv00379
Petitioner:
Jesus D Fuentes
Respondent:
Wayne T. Salisbury, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Fuentes v. Salisbury
as 1:2023cv00228
Petitioner:
Jesus D Fuentes
Respondent:
Wayne T. Salisbury, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jaye v. United States et al
as 1:2021cv00169
Defendant:
United States, US Attorney General Merrick Brian Garland, County of Union and others
Plaintiff:
Chris Ann Jaye
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241
Tefft, Sr. v. Coyne-Fague et al
as 1:2021cv00124
Defendant:
Billie-Jo Gallagher, Joshua Macomber, D Lapointe and others
Plaintiff:
Jared L. Teffts, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Fuentes v. Coyne-Fague
as 1:2020cv00111
Respondent:
Particia Coyne-Fague
Petitioner:
Jesus D Fuentes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Gonzalez v. Raimondo et al
as 1:2019cv00402
Defendant:
Brian LeClair, Trista D. Piccola, Governor Gina Raimondo and others
Plaintiff:
Tony G. Gonzalez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Neufville v. Barr et al
as 1:2019cv00348
Plaintiff:
Nyanati Jermaine Neufville
Defendant:
Jonathan Horton, M 4307 Nelligan, David D Rivera and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Neufville v. Barr et al
as 1:2019cv00292
Respondent:
Ronald D Vitiello, M 4307 Nelligan, United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement and others
Petitioner:
Nyanati Jermaine Neufville
Interested Party:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Vick v. United States Marshals Service et al
as 1:2019cv00267
Defendant:
Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives, United States Marshals Service, Donald W Wyatt Detention Facility and others
Plaintiff:
Charlie D. Vick
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. USA
as 1:2018cv00693
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Jason D. Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
