Cases 1 - 10 of 68
Truitt v. Mcdougle et al
as 5:2024cv00277
Plaintiff:
Jessie F Truitt, III
Defendant:
Mike Mcdougle, Susanne Campbell, FNU Madden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Truitt v. OIG et al
as 5:2024cv00218
Plaintiff:
Jessie F Truitt, III
Defendant:
OIG and FNU Sullivan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brewer v. Regalado et al
as 4:2023cv00483
Petitioner:
Renel Anthony Brewer
Respondent:
Victor Regalado, Eric Kitch and Gentner F Drummond
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Truitt v. Campbell et al
as 5:2023cv01004
Plaintiff:
Jessie F Truitt, III
Defendant:
Susanne Campbell, Dr Jeanna Morgan, FNU Madden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Wanjiku v. Boggess
as 4:2023cv00363
Petitioner:
Erick Wanjiku
Respondent:
Gary Boggess and Gentner F Drummond
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Barnes v. Tulsa Police Department et al
as 4:2023cv00288
Defendant:
B Keener, J Faircloth, Tulsa Police Department and others
Plaintiff:
Dario Perez Barnes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chiwanga v. State of Oklahoma
as 4:2023cv00141
Petitioner:
Jackson Peter Chiwanga
Respondent:
State of Oklahoma
Defendant:
Gentner F Drummond
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv00823
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Laffoon v. Nunn
as 6:2022cv00110
Petitioner:
William F. Laffoon
Respondent:
John O'Connor and Scott Nunn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Laffoon v. Joseph et al
as 6:2021cv00289
Plaintiff:
William F. Laffoon
Defendant:
David C. Joseph and Ben Hilfiger
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
