Cases 1 - 10 of 33,373
Dayton #355356 v. Thornell et al
as 4:2024cv00257
Petitioner:
Robert Guy Dayton, Jr.
Respondent:
Ryan Thornell, Staci Ibarra and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Settles v. Hudson
as 4:2024cv00258
Petitioner:
Andrew Settles
Respondent:
B Hudson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Waide #067117 v. Unknown Party et al
as 2:2024cv01153
Plaintiff:
Jerry Lee Waide, Jr.
Defendant:
Unknown Party, NaphCare and Unknown Parties
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rogel-Martinez v. Skinner et al
as 2:2024cv01167
Plaintiff:
Bernice Felicia Rogel-Martinez
Defendant:
Russell Skinner and Maricopa County Estrella Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bender v. Unknown Parties
as 2:2024cv01170
Plaintiff:
Thomas Bender
Defendant:
Unknown Parties
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chavez v. Maricopa County Sheriff's Office
as 2:2024cv01169
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Laura Chavez
Defendant:
Maricopa County Sheriff's Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bender v. Unknown Parties
as 2:2024cv01172
Plaintiff:
Thomas Bender
Defendant:
Unknown Parties
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rodriguez v. Yuma Police Department et al
as 2:2024cv01159
Plaintiff:
Hector Jesus Rodriguez
Defendant:
Yuma Police Department, Yuma County Jail and Unknown Parties
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lindsey #333281 v. Thornell et al
as 2:2024cv01150
Petitioner:
Jason Christopher Lindsey, Jr.
Respondent:
Ryan Thornell and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mola #365547 v. Ramirez
as 3:2024cv08096
Plaintiff:
John Mola
Defendant:
Hecter Ramirez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
